<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Ogden Braincast #13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moon-town.com/comic/steve-ogden-braincast-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moon-town.com/comic/steve-ogden-braincast-13/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:18:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cathbad</title>
		<link>http://moon-town.com/comic/steve-ogden-braincast-13/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>cathbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moon-town.com/comic/?p=584#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>As usual, 25 minutes of enjoyable podcast. Love the jingle by the way :)

Several (approximative) quotes from your braincast : 
 &quot;No story without Character&quot; : relates to the &quot;identification process&quot; ; one reads stories, to enjoy &quot;ONEself&quot;. Identifying oneself to banana tree or a Nazi can work for some, but it&#039;s not for everybody. So, yes, Characters. Enjoyable characters. Stories like &quot;Amelie from Paris&quot;  have no villain in them. And they work.

To the question &quot;Where do you get your ideas ?&quot;, my personal answer would be  : mostly from two sources : 1) stories made up by other people that I enjoys; 2) a never resting, wandering brain which can ponder over a stupid gallery sign for ten minutes, wondering if it could be part of a story taking place in the Iron Age.

 &quot;trick your brain to become more receptive to external influences&quot;
 &quot;let things marinate in your brain&quot;
E-xac-tly

 &quot;professional authors don&#039;t tell you much about the process&quot; : problem of dissecting inspiration. My point of view is that it&#039;s useless. Dissecting only serves one purpose: analysis. And inspiration never comes (as far as I&#039;m concerned) from analysis. It comes from emotion.

&quot;motivation&quot; : a lot different than inspiration. &quot;The thing that gets it done&quot;. 
&quot;motivation builds on itself&quot; &amp; &quot;delaying tactics&quot;
This is the tricky part. If you want to become a writer, you must have a strong enough ego to make you spend thousands of hours working for no salary writing stuff that most likely nobody else will ever read. An excellent interview with Paul Auster I watched some years ago  explained that better than I could ever do.

Some of my &#039;rough&#039; principles.
1) stop watching TV : TV is a sense duller. Stopping watching TV is the better decision I ever made (apart from marrying my wife).
2) Beware of the internet. It&#039;s a tool, nothing more. That being said, it&#039;s the most awesome tool ever provided to authors. (in terms of documentation)
3) confrontation between unrelated ideas often propel a fuzzy story idea from the stage of fuzziness to that of liveliness. Our own CucuC storyline was born from the meeting of LOTR/Celtic fandom &amp; John Irving&#039;s Garp.
4) trusting your emotions is vital. It&#039;s emotions that move human beings. Worse part in the writing process is the dulling of emotions. When that happens, I know I&#039;m on the wrong track. 

Thank you Steve, your podcasts are good for the soul. They really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, 25 minutes of enjoyable podcast. Love the jingle by the way <img src='http://moon-town.com/comic/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Several (approximative) quotes from your braincast :<br />
 &#8220;No story without Character&#8221; : relates to the &#8220;identification process&#8221; ; one reads stories, to enjoy &#8220;ONEself&#8221;. Identifying oneself to banana tree or a Nazi can work for some, but it&#8217;s not for everybody. So, yes, Characters. Enjoyable characters. Stories like &#8220;Amelie from Paris&#8221;  have no villain in them. And they work.</p>
<p>To the question &#8220;Where do you get your ideas ?&#8221;, my personal answer would be  : mostly from two sources : 1) stories made up by other people that I enjoys; 2) a never resting, wandering brain which can ponder over a stupid gallery sign for ten minutes, wondering if it could be part of a story taking place in the Iron Age.</p>
<p> &#8220;trick your brain to become more receptive to external influences&#8221;<br />
 &#8220;let things marinate in your brain&#8221;<br />
E-xac-tly</p>
<p> &#8220;professional authors don&#8217;t tell you much about the process&#8221; : problem of dissecting inspiration. My point of view is that it&#8217;s useless. Dissecting only serves one purpose: analysis. And inspiration never comes (as far as I&#8217;m concerned) from analysis. It comes from emotion.</p>
<p>&#8220;motivation&#8221; : a lot different than inspiration. &#8220;The thing that gets it done&#8221;.<br />
&#8220;motivation builds on itself&#8221; &amp; &#8220;delaying tactics&#8221;<br />
This is the tricky part. If you want to become a writer, you must have a strong enough ego to make you spend thousands of hours working for no salary writing stuff that most likely nobody else will ever read. An excellent interview with Paul Auster I watched some years ago  explained that better than I could ever do.</p>
<p>Some of my &#8216;rough&#8217; principles.<br />
1) stop watching TV : TV is a sense duller. Stopping watching TV is the better decision I ever made (apart from marrying my wife).<br />
2) Beware of the internet. It&#8217;s a tool, nothing more. That being said, it&#8217;s the most awesome tool ever provided to authors. (in terms of documentation)<br />
3) confrontation between unrelated ideas often propel a fuzzy story idea from the stage of fuzziness to that of liveliness. Our own CucuC storyline was born from the meeting of LOTR/Celtic fandom &amp; John Irving&#8217;s Garp.<br />
4) trusting your emotions is vital. It&#8217;s emotions that move human beings. Worse part in the writing process is the dulling of emotions. When that happens, I know I&#8217;m on the wrong track. </p>
<p>Thank you Steve, your podcasts are good for the soul. They really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
